The embassy to Achilles is in many ways the most interesting book of the Iliad in its examination of human motivation within the community of the Achaeans. Agamemnon takes a public step toward reconciliation in his admission of his own "madness" - and (as in Book 2) says it's time to pack up and go home. He resolves to return Briseis and many other gifts to Achilles, on one condition "Let him submit to me!" (256). But others undertake an embassy to Achilles. The ambassadors use a well-rehearsed sequence of rhetorical methods to persuade him to rejoin the battle, and end his self imposed exile. Certainly, his anger is still there, and until it is redirected against Hector, the Greeks have nowhere to go.
How do you read Achilles reactions to their entreaties? Is he undergoing a process of maturation, evolution, or does he know exactly what he is doing? Is either Agamemnon or Achilles more culpable than the other for the Greek's current predicament?
Recent Comments